Definition

securitisation

What is meant by securitisation?

Securitisation is a financial procedure in which securities are issued and backed by a pool of assets, usually fixed-income assets. The final product, i.e. the security, is widely known as Asset-Backed Security (ABS). Since the process converts an asset into a security, the process is called securitisation. The owner of the security owns a portion of the underlying asset and hence earns income from it.

The concept of securitisation is very similar to that of mutual funds as both have an underlying asset whose income is divided among its holders—the difference between the two lies in the kind of assets that are held as underlying assets. For example, mutual funds have publically traded stocks and bonds as the underlying asset. On the other hand, asset-backed securities are backed by less liquid debt assets.

 

Summary
  • Securitisation is a financial procedure in which securities are issued and are backed by a pool of assets.
  • Debts and illiquid assets may be used for securitisation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Which are the assets used for securitisation?

Debt

One of the main aims of a securitisation transaction is to allow a lender to refinance the debt owned by them. In other words, a lender can securitise his assets to further invest in the business. As a result, the underlying assets are usually illiquid. Further, such debt assets are difficult to be sold directly as each of those debts have unique features, including different credit profiles. While primarily large debt like mortgage debt is used for securitisation, it also includes short term and low-value debt assets like consumer debt and credit card debt which generate lower returns. In a securitisation transaction, multiple debt assets of a similar kind are clubbed together to create one large pool of assets. In effect, securitisation pools together multiple assets with similar fundamental characteristics, but challenging to be traded individually to create one marketable asset.

Following are some of the common debts used for securitisation:

  • Residential mortgages or home loans: The subprime debt crisis was caused as a result of the securitisation of residential mortgages with a poor credit profile.
  • Consumer debt, primarily credit cards: While most of the other underlying debt assets have longer maturity, credit cards have lower tenures, typically in days. However, the assets created on such debt assets have longer maturities than their underlying assets. This is done by using the cash inflows from repayments to buy more assets. At times, a security might be created even before the existence of an underlying asset, and this is commonly referred to as "securitisation of future cash flows."
  • Automobile loans
  • Commercial mortgages
  • Business loans
  • Commercial loans
  • Education loans (mainly in the US)

Image © Tania2sv| Megapixl.com

Illiquid assets

While less liquid debt is majorly used as underlying assets for securitisation, any asset that can generate cash flows can create securities. Some of the other assets commonly used for securitisation include:

Although rare, publically traded financial instruments could also be used as underlying assets for securitisation. These include bonds and units in hedge funds. In addition, at times, asset-backed security can also be used as an underlying asset for another asset-backed security.

What do we know about the securitisation process?

The securitisation process is a complex transaction involving multiple parties-

The first party in the process is the originator, who holds the underlying asset. He initiates the process by selling the assets by creating a legal entity called a special purpose vehicle (SPV). An SPV aims to contain the risks of the final investor with regards to the originator. As the assets are sold to an SPV, the originator does not have any legal claims on the assets. As a result, the end investor is protected from the risk of the seller turning insolvent.

© Josepalbert13 | Megapixl.com

There are two kinds of securitisation. In traditional securitisation, the assets are sold to the SPV. On the other hand, in a "synthetic" securitisation, the originator retains ownership of the assets and by means of a credit derivative transfers the risk to the SPV . The assignor does not receive any liquidity from this transaction, but it does allow him/her to externalise the risk of holding securitised assets.

The role of an SPV varies from case to case, but broadly, its role is primarily legal. It does not have an active role in the whole process. In certain situations, the SPV issues the securities. On the other hand, there are also instances wherein the SPV sells the pool of assets to a trust. The trust then creates and issues the securities to the investors. In such cases, the trust typically acquires assets from multiple SPVs and uses them for securitisation.

One of the key players in the process is the arranger. Usually a bank,  the arranger is in charge of setting up the transaction and evaluating the pool of assets. Further, it also plays an active role in deciding how it will be fed, the features of the securities to be issued, and the fund's perspective structuring. The arranger also plays an important role in the distribution of securities to end investors. The distribution process is especially critical in securitisation since these securities are traded over the counter to a small number of customers.

The goal of structuring is to model the properties of the securities to match the requirements of the ultimate investor. Therefore, the amortisation criteria for the security are determined in advance, rather than simply paying the ultimate investor the money earned by the assets.

In certain types of securities, the underlying assets can be "topped up," which means the pool of assets can be replenished over the security's lifetime. For example, this allows short-term loans (such as credit card debt) to be refinanced with long-term bonds.

As can be understood, the three actors: the "originator," "SPV," and "arranger ", combine to create the "Originate-to-Distribute" paradigm, which has prospered over the last few years.