As billions of dollars continue to flow through the DeFi ecosystem on a near-daily basis, the question of who truly controls these assets has become increasingly glaring — especially with recent events demonstrating that entrusting one’s digital assets in the hands of centralized (CEX) entities can sometimes lead to catastrophic losses.
The recent Bybit hack is a stark reminder of this reality, with bad actors making off with an unprecedented $1.5 billion worth of funds in what has become the largest crypto theft in history.
This wasn’t an isolated incident as January 2025 alone saw the crypto industry hemorrhage $73.9 million across 19 separate hacking incidents, thus highlighting a common vulnerability among all of these instances, i.e. the centralized control of one’s private keys.
Crypto losses December 2024 vs January 2025 (source: Immunefi)
And, while the conversation may be a difficult one, these sobering statistics have once again highlighted a fundamental truth wherein self-custody cannot be thought of just as a preference but rather an essential safeguard for anyone serious about preserving their digital wealth.
The liberation of self-custody
From the outside looking in, self-custody represents the purest expression of blockchain’s original promise of financial sovereignty without intermediaries.
When users can retain control of their private keys, they eliminate any single points of failure that are commonly prevalent across the CEX landscape.
As a result, the responsibility and control of their assets then rests squarely in their hands, transforming the entire dynamic from a vulnerable trust arrangement to a direct, sovereign relationship with one’s wealth.
Furthermore, self-custody ensures a high degree of privacy, allowing users to manage their assets without subjecting themselves to invasive KYC procedures and surveillance that have become the norm today.
In this regard, several modern solutions have emerged to help allay these bottlenecks — from non-custodial mobile wallets that prioritize convenience to hardware devices that provide air-gapped security for high-value holdings.
Moreover, many platforms too have embraced self-custody principles to pioneer a new standard for user empowerment, with none exemplifying this approach more comprehensively than Giza.
To elaborate, the platform’s innovative approach centers around its smart account infrastructure which creates a clear separation between control and execution, allowing users to delegate specific actions to autonomous agents without surrendering ultimate authority over their holdings — all enabled thanks to the system’s sophisticated ‘session key management’ system.
Unlike traditional approaches that require users to choose between security and automation, Giza implements programmable authorization policies that create verifiable security boundaries for automated operations.
These policies allow users to precisely define parameters around asset types, transaction sizes, approved protocols, and time limitations.
The result is a system that enables 24/7 automated market participation while maintaining cryptographically enforced guardrails that protect users from potential exploitation.
Moreover, such a setup supports another one of Giza’s core USPs, i.e. autonomous agents that can navigate the complexity of DeFi markets on its users’ behalf.
The flagship implementation of this technology, ARMA, already allows users to continuously analyze market conditions across protocols and execute sophisticated yield strategies without requiring constant oversight.
Lastly, it bears mentioning that Giza has developed a semantic abstraction layer that transforms complex protocol interactions into standardized operations, allowing these agents to reason about and execute financial strategies naturally across different protocols, reducing integration complexity while maintaining consistent execution patterns.
Securing tomorrow
When envisioning a safe and secure crypto ecosystem, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the future of digital asset management lies with those models that prioritize self-custody over everything else.
To this point, a recent study indicates that only about 60% of people familiar with crypto-enabled tech are confident in the security of today’s centralized platforms.
Even more troublingly, 40% of current digital asset owners harbor doubts about the safety of the technology as a whole.
These statistics reveal a trust deficit that self-custody solutions are uniquely positioned to address.
Therefore, as this trend accelerates, platforms that fail to offer such options will likely find themselves at a competitive disadvantage and gradually weeded out of the market entirely. Interesting times ahead!
The post The power of possession and why self-custody is the only way moving forward appeared first on Invezz