Pennsylvania Supreme Court Agrees With The Nemeroff Law Firm: Recovery Of Compensation By Former Employee Against Employer Is In The Courtroom

January 29, 2025 04:00 AM PST | By Send2Press
Follow us on Google News: https://kalkinemedia.com/resources/assets/public/images/google-news.webp

PITTSBURGH, Pa., Jan. 29, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — The Nemeroff Law Firm is pleased to announce it has secured a landmark legal decision in favor of employees who are left without compensation because their occupational diseases developed long after their hazardous workplace exposures ended.

Nemeroff Law Firm
Image caption: Nemeroff Law Firm.

In the case of Brad Lee Herold, as Executor of the Estate of William L. Herold v. University of Pittsburgh, et al., 2025 WL 258783, — A.3d — (2025), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found the exclusivity provision of the Occupational Disease Act does not preclude an employee from seeking compensation through a civil action, when the timeliness provisions of the act operate as a de facto exclusion of coverage and preclude the historical quid pro quo or “grand bargain” between employer and employee from being effectuated.

The Herold decision builds on an earlier landmark ruling obtained more than a decade ago by the Nemeroff Law Firm in Tooey v. A.K. Steel, 81 A.3d 851 (2013) when the Supreme Court found the exclusivity provision of Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act was not implicated when the occupational disease did not develop within the act’s 300-week jurisdictional time period.

In Herold, the decedent was employed by the University of Pittsburgh for more that 40 years as a stationary engineer working on its campus facilities where he was exposed to asbestos which resulted in his development of mesothelioma some fifteen years after his exposures to asbestos ended. During litigation, the University acknowledged the court’s holding in Tooey permitted the decedent to file a civil action to obtain compensation. But it argued it was immune from civil liability under the Occupational Disease Act and its exclusive remedy provision. The University was joined by two additional state universities, amici Pennsylvania State University and Temple University. In a fifty-two (52) page opinion, the Supreme Court rejected the University’s arguments finding they would shield the employer of all potential liability and would vitiate the quid pro quo, or “grand bargain” relied upon by the employee. In the Supreme Court’s own words: “Where there is no possibility of compensation, the Grand Bargain is no bargain.”

Together, Tooey, and now Herold, help protect the rights of injured workers. “These cases deliver a powerful message from the Supreme Court on the importance of protecting employee rights in the face of the corporate negligence” said Rick Nemeroff, founder of the Nemeroff Law Firm. “We believe every employee deserves the right to reasonable compensation for his injury or disease.” According to Nemeroff, “this case demonstrates that workers should not have to suffer in silence. They have the right to seek recourse against negligent, harmful, and unfair treatment by their employers.”

But the effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Herold is not limited to the decedent and his family. Rather, it sets a precedent that will resonate across beyond the Commonwealth’s boundaries. According to Nemeroff, “The decision we secured in Tooey has already helped shape the law which protects workers’ rights in other states. As the excitement surrounding this victory in Herold continues, the firm hopes to inspire other attorneys and firms to take on similar cases that advocate for individual rights and protect our rights within the court system.”

The Nemeroff Law Firm has made it the firm’s mission to fight for justice, and advocate for the injured. With this win, they continue their dedication to ensuring that individuals’ voices are heard and respected within the legal system.

About Nemeroff Law Firm:

Rick Nemeroff and the attorneys of The Nemeroff Law Firm have a combined 200+ years of experience in representing victims and their families against corporate negligence and wrongdoing. The Nemeroff Law Firm specializes in mesothelioma and catastrophic personal injury cases. With a commitment to advocating for justice, the firm has established a strong reputation for its dedication to its clients and its unwavering pursuit of justice in the legal system. Learn more: https://www.nemerofflaw.com/.

LOGO link for media: https://www.Send2Press.com/300dpi/25-0128-s2p-nemeroff-law-300dpi.jpg

News Source: Nemeroff Law Firm

To view the original post, visit: https://www.send2press.com/wire/pennsylvania-supreme-court-agrees-with-the-nemeroff-law-firm-recovery-of-compensation-by-former-employee-against-employer-is-in-the-courtroom/.

This press release was issued by Send2Press® Newswire on behalf of the news source, who is solely responsible for its accuracy. www.send2press.com.


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations, and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media LLC., having Delaware File No. 4697309 (“Kalkine Media, we or us”) and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyrighted to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures/music displayed/used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source (public domain/CC0 status) to where it was found and indicated it, as necessary.

This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.

Recent Articles

Investing Tips

Previous Next