Royal Dutch Shell Plc (LON: RDSA) Faces First Court Hearing in Climate Change Case

Summary

  • Shell is going to face a Dutch court in a climate case filed by environmentalists and human rights organisations
  • The environmentalists have demanded that the company should slash its reliance on fossil fuels
  • Shell has pledged to cut down its carbon emission by 30 per cent by 2035, and by 65 per cent in 2050

Oil and gas conglomerate Royal Dutch Shell is going to face a Dutch court on Tuesday in a climate case filed by environmentalists and human rights organisations who have demanded that the energy firm should slash its dependence on fossil fuels.

The first public hearing of the case is scheduled today and will be held at the district court of The Hauge, Netherlands. Other dates for hearings are 3, 15 and 17 December.

The litigation was filed in April 2019 by the seven activist organisations, which included Friends of the Earth Netherlands and Greenpeace. The organisations on behalf of more than 17,000 Dutch nationals have demanded that the energy firm should cut down its greenhouse gas discharges from now and lower it down to zero by 2050.

The activists said Anglo-Dutch company Shell is violating human rights of so many people by not paying heed to international climate goals and is still investing a lot of money in the exploitation of fossil fuels.

Donald Pols, director of Friends of the Earth Netherlands, said the lawsuit is unique which highlights possible substantial effects of the fossil fuel business on the environment. The activists are confident that the final verdict will compel Shell to stick to global climate goals.

Shell has frequently said that it endorses the climate goals that were laid down during the Paris Climate Agreement 2015 to tackle climate change issues. The firm has pledged to slash its carbon emission by 30 per cent by 2035, and by 65 per cent in 2050.

However, the activists have demanded that they should slash it by 45 per cent by 2030, which would help them in tackling the climate change threat.

Pols added that this is a big movement and added that the energy firm has been falsely conveying green pledge for long but has not been doing anything in this regard. The current lawsuit will show that Shell causes 95 per cent destruction to the environment, which needs an urgent change, he further added.

Also read: BP's plan for zero carbon emission by 2050, will other companies follow the suite?

In the meantime, Sara Shaw, International Program Coordinator for Climate Justice and Energy with Friends of the Earth International, said Shell is looking at this lawsuit with utmost seriousness, and other firms should also adhere to these goals. All those who pose a threat to the climate should be held accountable for stopping the emissions globally and protecting the environment, she said.

The activists are encouraged by the ‘Urgenda’ case in 2019 where the Dutch high court had directed the government to ramp up its battle against the environmental crisis and cut the carbon emissions more quickly than planned, calling it a human rights violation.

 

 

 

 


Disclaimer
The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Limited (Kalkine Media, we or us) and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. Kalkine Media is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority to provide regulated advice. The purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. The Content is guidance about the different types of investments that are available and sets out general principles to continue before making investment decisions. Kalkine Media is neither authorised nor qualified to provide regulated investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from an appropriately authorised and/or qualified financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.

   

Kalkine

Rated 4.3/5 based on 904 Reviews at Google My Business