AUS
NZ
UK
CA
USA
FRA
GER
ESP
ITA
NLD
PRT
SWE
GRC
IND
POL
BRA
ZAF
RUS
CHN
UAE
Highlights
The number of listed companies on the ASX has been steadily decreasing
ASIC introduces measures to ease IPO process for eligible firms
Dual-class share structures emerge as a debated mechanism for listings
The Australia equity market, tracked by indexes such as the S&P/ASX 200 and the All Ordinaries, is experiencing a decline in listed entities as companies increasingly avoid public offerings. Despite successful listings like Guzman Y Gomez (ASX:GYG), public market entries remain limited. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has acknowledged this trend, identifying structural and administrative hurdles in the listing process.
The public offering process in Australia
Companies seeking to float on the Australian Securities Exchange begin by submitting regulatory documents including a prospectus to ASIC. These documents detail operations, financial data, and associated disclosures to comply with listing obligations. Legal firms draft these papers, banks assist with the share issuance, and underwriters help ensure adequate capitalisation. Post-listing, firms face ongoing obligations such as continuous disclosure and corporate governance compliance under ASIC and ASX frameworks.
Motivations behind company listings
Public listings enable businesses to offer equity incentives to employees, aligning their interests with corporate growth. Additionally, firms can raise funds directly through share issuance, expanding access to broader capital markets. A listed status also improves transparency, which can build credibility with banks and counterparties. Moreover, liquid shares can facilitate corporate acquisitions and mergers by offering tradeable instruments in exchange deals.
ASIC’s response to declining IPO activity
To address the slowdown in listings, ASIC has proposed streamlining the IPO process through a fast-track review system. This approach aims to support companies with existing documentation preparedness, reducing revisions and administrative overhead. The fast-track route is intended for larger firms without ASX escrow obligations, making it accessible only to specific business profiles.
Escrow in capital markets context
Escrow arrangements serve as protective mechanisms during financial transactions, ensuring conditions are fulfilled before fund release. In the public listing context, absence of escrow requirements signifies fewer complexities, qualifying firms for streamlined regulatory processing under ASIC’s new pathway.
Structural limitations and listing reluctance
Despite reduced red tape, foundational challenges persist. Company founders often hesitate to relinquish control through public share issuance. In markets like the United States, Singapore, and Hong Kong, dual-class share structures allow control retention while accessing capital markets. These frameworks offer multiple voting rights to select shareholders, allowing original owners to maintain governance power post-listing.
Australia’s current structure and international contrast
The absence of dual-class options in Australia reduces flexibility for founders concerned about losing strategic control. Introducing such frameworks may align the ASX with other leading exchanges, supporting the broader effort to reinvigorate public market participation.
Market evolution and policy adjustments
The ongoing contraction in listings signals the need for structural shifts beyond administrative reforms. While ASIC’s initiatives may alleviate entry complexities, broader governance innovations such as alternative share structures could enhance the appeal of public listings within the Australia equity market.
