Glyphosate has been doing rounds amidst the Australian press. Nufarm Limited (ASX: NUF), a crop protection and seed technologies company, announced on 3rd June that it is adhering great caution and care as it foresees the risk of glyphosate litigation.
Looking back at significant jury verdicts in US courts against Monsanto since August 2018 would help understanding the situation better:
Monsanto developed the first ever glyphosate herbicides and in the 1970’s introduced them to the market. Since August 2018, there has been three major jury verdicts in the US courts against Monsanto, and recently in May 2019 a jury in Oakland, California USA awarded the plaintiff two billion dollars in damages in Monsanto Roundup Cancer Lawsuit trial. Glyphosate an active ingredient in Roundup has been linked to Cancer.
After Monsanto’s U.S patents expired, it opened opportunity for other players and since then other companies manufactured glyphosate. However, NUF in its market press release stated that it is not a manufacturer of glyphosate, but it does buy glyphosate material from the companies which manufacture it. The reason for the company to purchase it is to formulate the same into glyphosate-based products, fit for sale.
Till date, there have been no lawsuits filed against the company in any jurisdiction in which it operates, related to glyphosate-based herbicides and the suspected impacts it has on the human health. However, the company believes that the corporate risk relating to glyphosate has increased, and the company believes further market disclosure to be appropriate.
NUF is contented that glyphosate is safe if dealt in accordance with label directions.
Over the past 40 years glyphosate-based herbicides are the most extensively used crop guard products across the globe and have had vital role in environmentally sustainable farming practices.
Quite a few independent, science-based regulatory bodies have been evaluating the glyphosate-based herbicides and citing it to be safe when used with the directives provided.
Besides the prevention that the company is adhering to, there are various elements of the prior decisions related to US glyphosate that might be apt to understand and evaluate the company’s risk in this regard:
- The Monsanto jury decisions were influenced materially by aspects and considerations that are specific to Monsanto
- NUF’s market position regarding glyphosate is primarily different from that of Monsanto.
- All three previous judgments concluded to date are subject to appeal.
The company stated that these mitigants might not have ample effect and noted further that the issue of glyphosate litigation risk is not limited just to the US.
Besides this, there is another risk linked in relation to this along with the litigation concerning glyphosate- which is the maintenance of glyphosate-based product registrations across the globe. Even though the company’s sales of these products have not been negatively impacted, the risk of the glyphosate sales in the future across the world can have an adverse effect, considering the intense legal and public pressure that the product is exposed to.
The company stated in its release, that it would have a vigilant eye on the situation and keep the market posted of any material developments. It understands that regulators in prime markets have re-confirmed the security and registration of glyphosate-based products in the recent past.
Post the news the stock reacted on 3rd June 2019, when it fell 4.8% and closed at $3.79. Today, 5th June 2019, the shares of NUF are still under pressure and trading at $3.690 down by 1.609%, close to its 52-week low of $3.660 (as at AEST: 1:03 PM).
Below is a snapshot of the company’s finances, as released in its HY 19 presentation:
(Source: Company’s report)
This website is a service of Kalkine Media Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 629 651 672. The website has been prepared for informational purposes only and is not intended to be used as a complete source of information on any particular company. Kalkine Media does not in any way endorse or recommend individuals, products or services that may be discussed on this site. Our publications are NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold. We are neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice.