AUS
NZ
UK
CA
USA
FRA
GER
ESP
ITA
NLD
PRT
SWE
GRC
IND
POL
BRA
ZAF
RUS
CHN
UAE
_12_12_2024_07_12_16_441953.jpg)
Highlights
- Federal Court fines Bit Trade $8 million for regulatory breaches.
- ASIC's legal action addresses failures in compliance with DDO obligations.
- Kraken's margin extension caused significant financial losses to customers.
The operator of the Kraken crypto exchange, Bit Trade Pty Ltd, has been fined $8 million by the Federal Court of Australia for breaching regulatory compliance laws. The penalty relates to an unlawful credit facility offered to more than 1,100 customers through its ‘margin extension’ product, which resulted in significant financial losses for users.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) initiated legal proceedings against Bit Trade in September last year, alleging the company failed to issue a Target Market Determination (TMD) for the product. This oversight is a violation of the design and distribution obligations (DDO) under Australian financial law. TMDs ensure financial products meet the needs of their intended market and are distributed appropriately.
The margin extension offered by Bit Trade allowed Kraken users to access credit up to five times the value of their collateral. Customers could repay the credit in digital assets or fiat currencies. This product, active from October 2021, led to fees and interest charges exceeding A$10 million for its users, alongside losses totaling $7.8 million. One customer reportedly faced a staggering loss of $6.2 million.
The court found that the margin extension was a credit facility requiring a TMD under DDO laws. Justice John Nicholas emphasized that Bit Trade had not considered its legal obligations until alerted by ASIC. The company’s decision to continue offering the product even after ASIC raised concerns further demonstrated a failure to prioritize compliance. The court deemed the breaches serious, motivated by revenue maximization.
ASIC Chair Joe Longo highlighted the significance of the case, marking it as the regulator's first penalty for a lack of TMD. He stressed the importance of TMDs in safeguarding consumers from being sold unsuitable financial products. Longo also reiterated the broader applicability of existing laws to digital asset firms, urging them to ensure proper regulatory adherence.
Justice Nicholas criticized Bit Trade’s deficient compliance system and ordered the company to pay ASIC’s legal costs in addition to the fine. The case underscores the growing regulatory scrutiny faced by digital asset platforms and the need for robust compliance frameworks.
Bit Trade’s failure to meet legal requirements serves as a reminder for companies operating in the digital asset space to align with regulations and ensure consumer protection, setting a precedent for stricter enforcement in the sector.
