Two investment banks seek freedom from US SEC analyst research settlement

June 26, 2025 04:20 AM AEST | By EODHD

Google News:

Two investment banks seek freedom from US SEC analyst research settlement — Image source: Kalkine Media

Recent News

ASX Stocks Set to Open Lower as Global Markets Balance Optimism and Ca...

Macquarie (ASX:MQG) vs Coles (ASX:COL) – Which Shows Better Value in 2...

Cochlear and JB Hi-Fi Share Performance in 2025

Singular Health Group Expands Market Footprint with New ASX Securities...

By Jonathan Stempel NEW YORK (Reuters) -Piper Sandler and Stifel Financial (NYSE:SF) on Wednesday asked a judge to free them from "onerous" restrictions from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s global settlement more than two decades ago with 12 investment banks over analyst conflicts. The $1.5 billion settlement in 2003 and 2004 addressed a scandal over analysts issuing positive research to help Citigroup (NYSE:C), Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM), Morgan Stanley, the defunct Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, and others win investment banking business. In a filing in Manhattan federal court, Piper and Stifel said they should not be bound to requirements in a related consent decree, including having to build "firewalls" between research and investment banking, while nearly all rivals are held to looser standards the SEC approved in 2015. Piper and Stifel said the disparate treatment makes it harder to compete with other middle-market banks, as well as large banks that are bound by the settlement but have much larger client bases and are better known globally.

They also said the decree hurts the public interest because research may have different protections depending on which bank issued it, and smaller companies may struggle to raise capital because compliance costs mean some banks cannot afford to provide research coverage. "The consent decree has achieved its purpose," Piper and Stifel said. An SEC spokesperson declined to comment. Piper is based in Minneapolis, and Stifel is based in St. Louis.

They are the respective successors to US Bancorp (NYSE:USB) Piper Jaffray and Thomas Weisel Partners, the smallest investment banks in the SEC settlement. The settlement had been engineered mainly by former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, addressing alleged conflicts by analysts like Citigroup’s Jack Grubman and Merrill Lynch’s Henry Blodget. The cases are SEC v US Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 03-02942; and SEC v Thomas Weisel Partners LLC in the same court, No.

04-06910.

Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (“Kalkine Media, we or us”), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content.
Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyrighted to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have made reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.
This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.