SCHD vs JEPI: Which is a better ETF for income investors?

February 08, 2024 12:32 AM AEDT | By Invezz
 SCHD vs JEPI: Which is a better ETF for income investors?
Image source: Invezz

The Schwab US Dividend Equity (SCHD) and JPMorgan equity Premium Income (JEPI) are two popular ETFs among income investors. They both have high dividend yields and a good track record of rewarding holders. SCHD yields about 3.4% while JEPI yields almost 8%. So, which is the better fund to invest in between the two?

What are SCHD and JEPI?

SCHD and JEPI are ETFs that are designed to provide investors with regular and consistent dividends. But the two are significantly different since SCHD is a passive fund while JEPI is an active one. 

SCHD tracks the Dow Jones 100 index, which is made up of 100 quality companies that have a good track record of paying dividends. Some of the most notable companies in the fund are Broadcom, Home Depot, and Cisco. Most of these firms are in the health care, industrials, financials, and technology.

JEPI, on the other hand, is the biggest ETF offered by JPMorgan. It is an actively managed fund that uses a strategy known as a covered call. In addition to owning companies in the S&P 500 index, JEPI also sells S&P 500 index call options.

The goal of this approach is fairly simple. It benefits when the S&P 500 index rises. When this happens, it also benefits through the premium of its call option, which it can use to distribute to investors. JEPI’s call option also helps when the S&P 500 index declines since the premium usually offsets the losses. 

Which is the better buy?

As such, SCHD and JEPI aim to reward investors but use a different approach to do so. They also have different expense ratios. As a passive fund, the SCHD ETF costs just 0.06% while JEPI has an expense ratio of 0.35%. Therefore, in this case, SCHD seems like a better fund although the spread between the fees is not all that big.

JEPI vs SCHD

The other important metric to look at is the return between the two. In this case, as shown above, JEPI has returned 30.8% in the past three years while SCHD has had a 27% return. This return includes 2022 when American stocks tanked.

Looking at the performance in the past 12 months, we see that JEPI jumped by 11% while SCHD had just 3.38%. Therefore, this is a sign that JEPI’s returns are significantly better in difficult and better times than SXHD.

This happens because JEPI has a bigger exposure to the fast-growing technology sector compared to SCHD. In this case, while JEPI has a higher expense ratio, there are signs that it will continue doing better than SCHD in the long term. However, as I have written before, I believe that vanilla ETFs like SPY and QQQ are better alternatives to both JEPI and SCHD because of their long track record of performance.

The post SCHD vs JEPI: Which is a better ETF for income investors? appeared first on Invezz


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (“Kalkine Media, we or us”), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content.
Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyrighted to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have made reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.
This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.

AU_advertise

Advertise your brand on Kalkine Media

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.