Jack Ma-Xi Jinping Standoff: The Battle Between Chinese Govt vs Private Tech

4 min read | January 13, 2021 09:49 AM GMT | By Team Kalkine Media

After speculation of billionaire entrepreneur Jack Ma missing for two months, reports now claim that the Chinese government is seeking to nationalize his billion-dollar companies, Alibaba and the Ant Group. The rumors come in the backdrop of a Chinese regulatory probe into the former.

Things seem to have begun unravelling after Mr Ma, during a speech in Shanghai in October last year, hinted that China’s President Xi Jinping-led Communist government was stifling innovation in the country and called for reforming “the current system”.

The rocky relationship between the top businessman and the Chinese government, however, isn’t a new occurrence and can be roughly traced back to the Yu’e Bao incident around 2017.

Long History of Tensions Between Jack Ma & Xi Jinping

About four years ago, notices from state-run bank regulators saw Jack Ma rein in Ant Financial's money market fund Yu'e Bao, which was soaring to record heights with a total of about US$ 260 billion assets under management (AUM) at that time. After being forced to impose limits on new deposits by customers, its assets dropped to US$ 168 billion in the nine months ending December 2018.

More recently, the Chinese government announced in December that it will be closely monitoring “monopoly businesses” to make sure there is no “disorderly expansion of capital”. Soon after, an anti-monopoly probe was initiated into the Alibaba Group last month, while the Ant Group was reportedly asked to restructure its operations.

Not to forget, the Ant Group IPO, which was projected to raise US$ 37 billion in the biggest stock market debut ever, was suspended by Chinese regulatory bodies last year, weeks after it had already been approved for a dual listing in Shanghai and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.

Since the initiation of the probe in October last year, Alibaba stocks have fallen by over 25 per cent.

As a result, Jack Ma’s net worth has also seen a decline over the past three months. He was replaced by bottled water tycoon Zhong Shanshan as China’s richest person around September last year.

Chinese Govt Vs Chinese Tech Industry

With the regulatory bodies barreling down upon Ant and Alibaba, the country’s entire digital economy and user base is likely to take a hit. As per Ant Group’s IPO prospectus, its payment app Alipay sees over 80 million active merchants and about 711 million active users on a monthly basis, while providing digital payment services to over 200 countries and regions. The app also recorded a total payment volume of a whopping RMB 118 trillion in mainland China.

Experts opine that the regulatory measures are pressing down upon China’s fintech giants to put a check on their growth.

All this in-house scrutiny comes at a time when China is not on the best of terms with most major economies around the world. While the US perceives it as a “security threat” and is coaxing the UK, EU, Canada, and other nations to do the same, it is also almost constantly butting heads with Asian neighbors India, Japan, Taiwan, etc. To top it all, the country is also under pressure from international bodies such as WHO and other economies to allow investigation into the origins of COVID-19 virus in China's Wuhan, which has led to a raging worldwide pandemic.

Beijing’s global infrastructure project of Belt and Road Initiative, aka One Belt One Road (OBOR), is also under the scope as experts believe that it could lead to a restrain in global economic growth.

Keeping these factors in mind, China’s economic growth via a flourishing international export network may be tough to count on. As the second largest economy in the world, its second option is a homegrown infrastructure-driven domestic growth.

For now, it is difficult to predict whether the current regulatory showdown on homegrown mega tech titans is a wrong move or ends up benefitting the state-driven Chinese economy in the long run.


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Limited, Company No. 12643132 (Kalkine Media, we or us) and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. Kalkine Media is an appointed representative of Kalkine Limited, who is authorized and regulated by the FCA (FRN: 579414). The non-personalised advice given by Kalkine Media through its Content does not in any way endorse or recommend individuals, investment products or services suitable for your personal financial situation. You should discuss your portfolios and the risk tolerance level appropriate for your personal financial situation, with a qualified financial planner and/or adviser. No liability is accepted by Kalkine Media or Kalkine Limited and/or any of its employees/officers, for any investment loss, or any other loss or detriment experienced by you for any investment decision, whether consequent to, or in any way related to this Content, the provision of which is a regulated activity. Kalkine Media does not intend to exclude any liability which is not permitted to be excluded under applicable law or regulation. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable. However, on the date of publication of any such Content, none of the employees and/or associates of Kalkine Media hold positions in any of the stocks covered by Kalkine Media through its Content. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music/video that may be used in the Content are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music or video used in the Content unless stated otherwise. The images/music/video that may be used in the Content are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated or was found to be necessary.


Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next