German Court Rejects Lawsuit To Review Canada-EU Trade Pact

2 min read | March 02, 2021 03:39 PM EST | By Ipsita Sarkar

Source: Number1411,Shutterstock

Summary

  • German Federal Court rejects Die Linke’s petition to review participation in CETA.
  • The Canada-EU Trade Agreement came into effect in September 2017.
  • Die Linke claims that the government failed to adequately examine the pact.

Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court on Tuesday rejected an opposition lawsuit seeking another review into German participation in the Canada-EU Trade Agreement (CETA).

The opposition party Die Linke had asked the court to allow for further scrutiny whether the pact adversely affects German businesses. The CETA agreement came into effect in 2017.

The court had allowed German participation in CETA through an interim order in 2016.

In its petition, the Die Linke party said that the German parliament had failed to sufficiently evaluate the pact. The government, it said, should have passed a law to allow German negotiators to participate in the trade talks.

The court observed that the petition was inadmissible. However, it noted that if the EU has transgressed its powers, then such an action would be unconstitutional. It further stated that the EU cannot legitimize such action by passing a law in advance.

Although it has neither banned nor cleared the CETA on Tuesday, the court will still have to deal with several other complaints pending before it regarding the pact.

In its 2016 interim order, the court had allowed the government to provisionally agree to the treaty before it came into effect after further review. Germany would have been compelled to withdraw from the agreement if the top court had ruled against it.

Pic Credit: Pixabay.

Opposition To CETA

Besides Die Linke, also called the Left Party, several other German political groups have opposed the CETA, stressing that the EU has no powers to sign the pact unilaterally.

They claim that there are many areas in the agreement which only the respective governments can decide, but the EU has overlooked them in passing the pact.

Moreover, some of these issues have been pending before the court for years. Die Linke and others have questioned the controversial powers of the EU.

While passing the ruling, the court also observed that the parliamentarians had enough time to review the pact and whether it encroaches on the areas of government jurisdiction.


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Incorporated (Kalkine Media), Business Number: 720744275BC0001 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The advice given by Kalkine Media through its Content is general information only and it does not take into account the user’s personal investment objectives, financial situation and specific needs. Users should make their own enquiries about any investment and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media is not registered as an investment adviser in Canada under either the provincial or territorial Securities Acts. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, however, on the date of publication of any such Content, none of the employees and/or associates of Kalkine Media hold positions in any of the stocks covered by Kalkine Media through its Content. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used in the Content are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used in the Content unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used in the Content are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated or was found to be necessary.


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.