Why is HMRC’s new DeFi lending tax policy dubbed ‘unnecessary burden’?

February 04, 2022 03:09 AM AEDT | By Manu Shankar
 Why is HMRC’s new DeFi lending tax policy dubbed ‘unnecessary burden’?
Image source: © Chrisdorney | Megapixl

Highlights 

  • Britain’s tax agency, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), is bringing down the gavel on DeFi lending and staking rules which could have an impact on the development of innovation in the Decentralized Finance sector.
  • According to the updated regulatory document released by the HMRC, tax complications arise from whether the return accruing to the lender is made from providing a service, i.e. revenue, or from capital gains.
  • CryptoUK dubbed this latest development an ‘unnecessary burden.’

Britain’s tax agency, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is bringing down the gavel on DeFi lending and staking rules which could have a significant impact on the development of innovation in the Decentralized Finance sector.

According to the updated regulatory document released by the HMRC, the nature of the return received by the lender will primarily depend on the nature of the transaction. It further states that lending or staking of tokens through DeFi is a “constantly evolving” process, and therefore, it is difficult to determine the way in which lenders earn their returns. The tax complications arise from whether the return accruing to the lender is made from providing a service, i.e. revenue, or from capital gains.

Also read: Can UK be the home of cryptocurrencies?

The UK government has traditionally been known to take a grim view of cryptocurrencies or crypto adoption. However, contrary to the government’s view, crypto adoption by investors has been on a rise and is generally considered to be one of the hotbeds in Europe.

DeFi protocol allows users to trade and lend crypto assets without intermediaries. It is one of its unique features that has attracted lots of investors. But lack of proper documentation related to anti-money laundering and defined clear governance structures have had regulators constantly questioning its proper way of functioning.

Also read: UK’s FCA eyes crypto ad regulation, denounces ‘refer-a-friend' offers

‘Unnecessary burden’

Many market experts are now dubbing this latest development an “unnecessary burden.” Experts such as Ian Taylor, Executive Director of CryptoUK, feel that this adds to the tax burdens of the stakers. Besides, he lamented that with this new regulation, crypto investors will unnecessarily be burdened with an inconsistent approach as compared to a stock market investor.

He elaborated that with this new ruling, the crypto investors in Britain will have to include details of any lent assets during their tax filing. He further added that the new rules would further add to tax complications as the investors may have to disclose numerous tax transactions.

Will this hold the UK back in the crypto race?

Many believe that the UK, of late, has been trailing in the crypto race. Ask former Chancellor of the Exchequer and advisor Philip Hammond and he would tell you that the UK is behind other countries in Europe in setting a clear-cut stance when it comes to cryptos.

He warned the Boris Johnson government that if Britain continues to trail in the race, one could see countries such as Switzerland, Monaco, and Germany become the hotbeds of crypto activity in the future.

Matt Hancock, former Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, too has urged the House of Commons that the UK needs to take a more progressive stance when it comes to blockchain development in the country.

Hancock hinted that tokenisation could lead to better liquidity in assets and exploring the blockchain technologies could provide the UK an edge. Besides, he suggested cryptos could provide economic stimulation and could even reduce financial crimes in the country.

Viewpoint

It seems that UK regulators have taken a tougher stance on cryptocurrencies. The government seems to be in no hurry to come to a decision on cryptos – that is whether to regulate it or ban it – but it definitely has got investors on alert for some time now.


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (Kalkine Media, we or us), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.


AU_advertise

Advertise your brand on Kalkine Media

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.