Revaluating Bitcoin Power Law Theory

August 30, 2024 02:17 PM AEST | By Team Kalkine Media

Google News:

Revaluating Bitcoin Power Law Theory — Image source: shutterstock

Recent News

MS downgrades McDonald’s on limited upside and structural pressures on...

Chewy set-up into and post Q1 results is ’increasingly less attractive...

Tata Motors plans $4.1 billion investment in new models, EV production

Goldman Sachs downgrades Mobileye on limited market share, competitive...

The Bitcoin Power Law Theory (BPLT) represents the latest attempt to use mathematical models to forecast Bitcoin's value, drawing on the concept of power laws from physics. Despite its initial appeal, the BPLT faces significant criticisms due to its reliance on flawed assumptions and mischaracterizations of Bitcoin’s nature.

Developed by former physics professor Giovanni Santostasi, the BPLT proposes a price trajectory for {Bitcoin} (BTC), suggesting that the cryptocurrency will reach $1 million by 2036 based on historical price bands. Proponents argue that because power laws are observed in natural phenomena, Bitcoin’s adherence to such a model implies it behaves like a physical system governed by physical laws.

However, this perspective is problematic for several reasons:

1. Misclassification of Bitcoin: Bitcoin is fundamentally a digital construct governed by cryptographic protocols and code, not a physical system. Its core nature is rooted in information theory, not physics. This distinction is crucial because Bitcoin operates within the economic, social, and technological realms, rather than physical systems.

2. Scale and Context Mismatch: The BPLT attempts to apply physical system models to Bitcoin, which operates across different domains. Bitcoin's price movements are influenced by economic factors, market sentiment, and social dynamics, which are not easily reconciled with the principles of physical systems.

3. Methodological Inconsistencies: The theory seeks to use financial data to forecast Bitcoin’s price while treating it as a physical system. This approach fails to adequately link financial metrics with physical phenomena, leading to inconsistencies in the model.

4. Human Factors and Social Dynamics: Bitcoin’s functionality and value are heavily influenced by human behavior, market expectations, regulatory environments, and geopolitical factors. Unlike autonomous physical systems, Bitcoin is subject to the volatility of human-driven markets and institutions.

5. Inadequate Consideration of External Influences: The BPLT does not account for critical factors such as regulatory changes, market manipulation, and geopolitical events that impact Bitcoin’s value. These elements contribute to the complexity of Bitcoin as a global financial asset.

Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (Kalkine Media, we or us), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.