SMH vs SOXX: Better semiconductor ETF to buy?

June 13, 2024 04:05 PM AEST | By Invezz
 SMH vs SOXX: Better semiconductor ETF to buy?
Image source: Invezz

Semiconductor companies are thriving this year as demand for artificial intelligence (AI) continued rising. Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) stock has gone bonkers, giving it a valuation of about $3 trillion while Broadcom is valued at over $700 billion. 

One way of investing in semiconductor companies is to allocate cash in exchange traded funds (ETFs). The Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) ETF has been the best-performing ETF in the industry in the past decade as it jumped by over 600%.

While the SOXL ETF is a good one, it also carries risks because of its substantial leverage and higher-than-average expense ratio. Therefore, if you are not willing to take this risk, you may consider investing in generic funds like the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) or the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX).

These ETFs are quite similar in that they track the biggest semiconductor ETFs in the United States and have a similar expense ratio of 0.35%.

They also track similar companies, with the biggest names being companies like Nvidia, Broadcom, Qualcomm, and Applied Materials. 

The only difference is how these companies are weighted. Nvidia, Broadcom, and Qualcomm are the biggest part of the SOXX ETF, accounting for 10%, 8%, and 7.3% of the fund. 

Nvidia, Taiwan Semiconductor, and Broadcom are the biggest parts of the SMH ETF, with a share of 24.2%, 12.7%, and 7.4%, respectively. This means that the SMH is more exposed to Nvidia than SOXX.

As a result, the SMH fund has done better than SOXX over the years. Its total return in the past five years stood at over 433% while the SOXX has jumped by 320%. The same happened in the past 12 months as the SMH returned 75% against 50%. 

SOXX vs SMH 5-year performance

Therefore, based on the historic performance, the SMH ETF has been the better performer. Its worst year in the past decade was in 2022 when it plunged by over 33%. SOXX dropped by 35% in that period. Before that, the SOXX ETF dropped by 6.48% in 2008 while the SMH fund dropped by 9%. 

Past performance is not always an indicator of future performance. However, I believe that it makes sense to invest in assets that have demonstrated strong performance in the past. This makes the SMH a better investment than SOXX, which explains why it has accumulated over $22.9 billion in assets while SOXX has over $15 billion.

The post SMH vs SOXX: Better semiconductor ETF to buy? appeared first on Invezz


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (“Kalkine Media, we or us”), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content.
Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyrighted to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have made reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.
This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.

AU_advertise

Advertise your brand on Kalkine Media

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.