Why did 64 asset management firms fail to meet the UK ESG code?

3 min read | September 06, 2021 07:21 PM AEST | By Suhita Poddar

Highlights 

  • A new report by UK security regulator, the Financial Reporting Council, found several asset managers, pension funds, and insurance companies failed to meet UK’s stricter ESG best practice code.
  • All 300 asset managers existing signatories to the older code had to reapply, of which the FRC has received 189 applications so far.
  • 125 of the 189 companies met the new ESG investing standards, which included BlackRock, Fidelity, Legal & General and others, while 64 failed to meet the new standards

About 64 asset management firms, pension scheme funds and insurance companies failed to meet the new and stricter environment, social and governance (ESG) best practice standards, according to a new report published today by UK security regulatory body, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC).

The revamped ESG stewardship code was put in place in order to combat greenwashing practices in businesses. FRC revamped its ESG codes last year as the UK aims to become the hub of sustainable investment and financing.

Schroders, Morgan Stanley and Rothschild were the major companies that failed to meet the new stewardship code due to a lack of proper evidence.

Greenwashing is when an organisation puts a false or misleading marketing spin on their business practices to prove they are environmentally friendly to their consumers and other stakeholders.

FRC’s report findings

The FRC stated it received only 189 applications from the 300 asset managers as all prior signatories to the earlier code had to reapply to ensure compliance with the new code. The 189 companies have a combined asset under management (AUM) of £32 trillion.

About 125 asset management funds met the new ESG standards, which includes private equity giant BlackRock, US based asset management company Fidelity, UK based life insurance and other investments provider Legal & General, British investment manager M&G and abrdn.

While 64 did not meet the new ESG standards due to a lack of proper evidence. Some of the big investment management companies which failed to meet the new ESG investment codes include British multinational asset management firm Schroders, global investment company Morgan Stanley and UK based legacy asset management firm, Rothschild.

© 2021 Kalkine Media Ltd.

Related Video: How The UK Can lead The Way On Global ESG Standards?

Revamped ESG code

The stricter code includes 12 principles wherein companies had to provide evidence for the first time showing how fund managers exercised rights for listed equity assets and demonstrated how they integrate their ESG responsibilities with their investments.

The companies which failed to meet the new codes can reapply in the future after taking into consideration the feedback provided by the FRC.

Bottom Line

ESG investing has grown in recent years, and investors demand a more sustainable approach towards investing.  As the climate emergency becomes an ever-nearing reality, sustainable investing and climate focused finance is expected to grow even further in the coming years.

Given the UK’s aim of becoming a global hub in sustainable finance, ensuring greenwashing is stamped out from current business practices is a welcome move.


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (Kalkine Media, we or us), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.


AU_advertise

Advertise your brand on Kalkine Media

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.