Plaintiffs' Attorneys Blow the Whistle on J&J's Back-Door Bankruptcy Tactic in Talc/Ovarian Cancer Litigation

May 02, 2024 06:55 AM AEST | By EIN Presswire
 Plaintiffs' Attorneys Blow the Whistle on J&J's Back-Door Bankruptcy Tactic in Talc/Ovarian Cancer Litigation
Image source: EIN Presswire
PENSACOLA, FL, U.S.A., May 1, 2024 /EINPresswire.com/ -- Heavy-hitter mass tort law firms Levin Papantonio Rafferty (LPR) and Beasley Allen Law Firm issued a letter today to members of the legal community, warning them of the pitfalls of Johnson & Johnson's "prepackaged" Chapter 11 proposal. After two failed bankruptcy attempts (Case No. 21-30589 and Case No. 23-12825), the multinational company is now directly soliciting law firms to take deals that, according to LPR Attorney Chris Tisi, would settle plaintiffs' claims at a fraction of their worth (see J&J press release, "Johnson & Johnson Announces Plan by its Subsidiary, LLT Management LLC, to Resolve All Current and Future Ovarian Cancer Talc Claims Through a Consensual 'Prepackaged” Reorganization," published May 1, 2024 on the company's website).

Tisi serves as a member of the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in this multidistrict litigation.

“The average settlement value here doesn’t even approach the average cost of woman who has ovarian cancer,” Tisi said. “The average cost of treating a woman is $220,000, and the projected value of the settlement is far less than this amount—that doesn’t even take into account the patient’s loss of income, pain and suffering, and other damages.”

A threshold of 75% of plaintiffs who allegedly developed mesothelioma or ovarian cancer after using J&J's talc powder would have to approve the terms of the settlement. In a letter sent today to claimants' lawyers, LPR Attorney Mike Papantonio and Beasley Allen Law Firm Attorney Andy Birchfield alerted attorneys to a "ballot-stuffing" tactic J&J has pioneered to get this supermajority vote. The letter states:

"[J&J is] hoping to stuff the ballot with Johnny-come-lately, watered-down claims. They’re afraid of a legitimate vote among the truly sick and families of the deceased who have been battling J&J’s obstruction and bad faith for years and who are supported by numerous scientific studies showing that talc contains asbestos and other known cancer-causing ingredients."

Facts and Numbers for Consideration

The attorneys, who represent a coalition of lawyers representing tens of thousands of women who have suffered as the result of using J&J's talc-based powder products, presented the following facts:

* Currently, more than 50,000 plaintiffs in the multidistrict litigation (MDL 2738, IN RE: Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation) allege that J&J's talc products caused claimants to develop ovarian cancer. (Source: U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation)
* Medical costs for ovarian cancer treatment can exceed $1.5 million per patient.
* Average costs for treating ovarian cancer are $220,000 per patient (Source: National Cancer Institute).
* Ovarian cancer patients also bear the burden of lost wages and other costs related to having a serious, lifelong illness.
* J&J is promising minimal payments to cancer claims outside of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma--claims that J&J officials previously testified as being "worthless"--in exchange for a "yes" vote on J&J's prepackaged Chapter 111 proposal.
* With a supermajority support of this diluted payment plan, legitimate victims of talc-caused ovarian cancer or mesothelioma will be positioned to receive far less compensation than their claims are worth.
* If a bankruptcy court accepts the proposal, J&J would pay pennies on the dollar for ovarian cancer and mesothelioma claims.
If successful, this ballot-box-stuffing tactic will set a precedent that emboldens other corporations to follow suit: subverting the U.S. bankruptcy system, evading accountability for serious medical conditions they cause.
* J&J has faced jury verdicts of more than $5 billion in a small number of talc/ovarian cancer trials.

"Negotiating with companies that exploit legal loopholes to skirt their responsibilities isn't just unwise; it's a betrayal of the victims we represent," states Papantonio's and Birchfield's letter.

The letter cautions plaintiffs' attorneys to "do what's best" for their clients and encourages lawyers to "remain unified in opposition to [J&J's] scheme."

Sara Stephens
Levin Papantonio Rafferty
+1 281-744-6560
email us here
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Instagram
YouTube


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (“Kalkine Media, we or us”), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content.
Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyrighted to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have made reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.
This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.


AU_advertise

Advertise your brand on Kalkine Media

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.