Dad challenges life sentence for cold blooded killings

April 19, 2023 10:47 AM AEST | By AAPNEWS
 Dad challenges life sentence for cold blooded killings
Image source: AAPNEWS

A Melbourne man who murdered his daughter and son-in-law in cold blood because they didn't ask his permission to marry has challenged the life sentence he received.

One of the judges who will decide his case says it's difficult to imagine a more callous crime committed against one's own child.

Osman Shaptafaj was ordered to serve at least 35 years behind bars for the murder of 25-year-old Lindita Musai and her husband Veton Musai, 29, on December 31, 2019.

The couple were returning home from a getaway celebrating their first wedding anniversary.

Shaptafaj, who had been estranged from his daughter for eight years, was not asked for permission or invited to the wedding - both things he later said were sore points.

Justice Phillip Priest said it was hard to find anything that mitigated his actions.

"These were cold blooded killings, premeditated (and) carried out for what it seems no better reason than your client's dignity was in some way offended," he told Shaptafaj's barrister Rishi Nathwani on Wednesday.

"It's difficult to imagine a more callous crime committed against one's own child."

Shaptafaj lay in wait for nearly two hours for Lindita and Veton to arrive home on the night he killed them. As they approached their Yarraville front door he shot them in the head.

Justice Stephen Kaye said his actions were not spur of the moment. He had taken out his gun, loaded it, taken extra ammunition, driven to their home and waited.

"He had every chance to desist. He had one-and-a-half-hours. All he could do was think about murdering, cold-bloodedly executing his daughter for no other reason than they'd slighted him," he said.

Mr Nathwani argued the sentence handed to Shaptafaj was manifestly excessive.

He said his client was entitled to a discount for having pleaded guilty, saving the court the expense of a trial, and further turmoil for Lindita and Veton's families.

Shaptafaj was also entitled to a sentencing discount because of his age, his lack of criminal history and a finding that prison would be more difficult for him, he said.

Justice Priest said another way of looking at it was that some killings are so bad that nothing other than life is appropriate.

Prosecutor Diana Piekusis KC said given the enormity of Shaptafaj's crime, and his exceedingly high level of culpability, the sentence was within the range available.

The appeal justices will hand down their decision at a later date.

Outside court Drilon Musai said he hoped people would remember his brother and sister-in-law for who they were, not what happened to them.

"The judges, they seemed understanding and I think they understand the gravity and the heinousness of the crime, so hopefully common sense prevails and we don't have to go through this again," he said.

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

Lifeline 13 11 14


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (“Kalkine Media, we or us”), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content.
Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyrighted to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have made reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.
This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.


AU_advertise

Advertise your brand on Kalkine Media

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.