Australian Adoptees Seek Government Inquiry into South Korean Adoption Practices

3 min read | April 09, 2025 03:06 PM AEST | By Team Kalkine Media

Highlights:

  • Australian-Korean adoptees are petitioning for a federal investigation into overseas adoptions from South Korea.

  • Allegations include document falsification and misidentification of adoptees by South Korean agencies.

  • KADS Connect urges transparency and access to birth records from state and federal authorities.

A growing number of adoptees of South Korean origin in Australia are calling for a formal investigation into the historical handling of international adoptions. The focus centers on the systemic management of adoptions from South Korea since the late seventies, with claims of ethical breaches and human rights concerns gaining traction.

KADS Connect, a newly established advocacy group formed by Australian-Korean adoptees, is petitioning the federal government to review the involvement of national and state-level agencies. The organisation aims to shed light on long-standing issues tied to documentation practices, identification errors, and restricted access to personal records.


Interim Findings from South Korea Raise Alarming Concerns

The push for accountability follows interim findings from a Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Korea. This commission has been examining the conduct of privately owned adoption agencies within the country. Evidence has surfaced pointing to widespread falsification of records, including manipulated birth certificates and altered identities of adopted children.

Eastern Social Welfare Society, the agency involved in all adoptions from South Korea to Australia, has been specifically mentioned. Investigations have revealed that personnel affiliated with the agency allegedly exchanged money with healthcare facilities in return for newborns. In one instance, a child was adopted using the identity of a deceased infant, altered only by the addition of a character in the record.


Adoptees Demand Reform and Access to Historical Records

Adoptees in Australia are reporting significant difficulty in retrieving accurate information about their origins. Many have expressed frustration at what they describe as administrative barriers, misinformation, and resistance from both state and federal departments. Advocates argue that these practices obstruct their basic right to know their backgrounds.

One adoptee, who was placed with an Australian family in the late eighties, has shared her experience of discovering that her biological parents had never formally consented to the adoption. Her story underscores the emotional and ethical complexity surrounding many of these cases. She stated that while other countries have acted to address systemic misconduct, Australia has not initiated a similar inquiry.


Political Support for a Formal Inquiry Emerging

In response to public pressure and advocacy efforts, there are indications of political momentum building in support of a national investigation. A parliamentary inquiry has been proposed following the federal election, with calls growing for a comprehensive examination into the role of Australian institutions in overseas adoptions.

This inquiry would align with initiatives undertaken in other regions, where government-led investigations have acknowledged historical wrongdoing and introduced reforms to adoption frameworks. Adoptee-led groups in Australia argue that a similar review is necessary to ensure transparency and prevent the recurrence of past misconduct.


Ongoing Push for Recognition and Accountability

As the campaign by KADS Connect gains attention, the human rights aspects of international adoption remain at the forefront. The petition highlights a broader call for justice, aiming to have the experiences of adoptees formally recognised and to establish pathways for accessing family and birth documentation.

The issue continues to resonate deeply within the community of adoptees, many of whom are seeking not only answers but systemic changes that acknowledge the longstanding impact of adoption policies and practices.


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Pty Ltd (Kalkine Media, we or us), ACN 629 651 672 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated as or found to be necessary.


AU_advertise

Advertise your brand on Kalkine Media

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.