With the cost of everyday items a growing concern for Australian consumers, the actions of the country's major supermarket chains are under intense scrutiny. Coles (ASX:COL) and Woolworths (ASX:WOW), Australia's two largest grocers, have faced a string of negative headlines over the past year, from accusations of price gouging to disputes with suppliers. Recently, both chains made headlines again, this time for being taken to the Federal Court by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
The ACCC claims that Coles and Woolworths systematically misled customers about discounts on hundreds of products, including household staples like Tim Tams, Doritos salsa, and Energizer batteries. According to the consumer watchdog, the retailers inflated prices for up to six months, raised them by at least 15%, and then promoted these items as discounted through their "Prices Dropped" (Woolworths) or "Down Down" (Coles) campaigns. Rather than offering real savings, these promotions allegedly duped customers into thinking they were getting a deal, when in fact, the prices were sometimes higher than before.
The court action is the latest blow to Coles' and Woolworths' reputations, already strained by increasing consumer distrust. Over the past year, scrutiny of supermarket pricing has intensified as households have struggled with rising inflation and higher interest rates. The public backlash against misleading marketing practices has been particularly fierce, with many consumers expressing frustration at being misled by deceptive discounts.
What makes this case even more interesting is how it came about. It wasn’t consumer action groups that brought these allegations to the ACCC’s attention. Instead, it was everyday Australians, fed up with the misleading marketing tactics, who voiced their complaints to the ACCC and took to social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and TikTok to express their frustration. This grassroots movement spurred the ACCC to investigate, leading to the court case against the supermarket giants.
Gina Cass-Gottlieb, chair of the ACCC, emphasized that consumer complaints were the catalyst for the investigation. She explained that the watchdog began tracking social media, noticing a trend of customers reporting prices they felt were not genuine. An in-depth investigation followed, revealing that Woolworths had increased the prices of at least 266 products before promoting them as discounted, while at least 245 Coles products were subject to similar practices.
Both supermarkets have denied any wrongdoing. Coles issued a statement defending its actions, stating that the allegations arose during a period of significant cost inflation when it was receiving numerous price increases from suppliers. Woolworths also responded, stating that it would carefully review the claims and work with the ACCC to address the matter.
As many Australian households face rising living costs, accurate pricing and genuine discounts have become more important than ever. Cass-Gottlieb stressed that pricing claims must be transparent and truthful, particularly in the current economic climate. Food insecurity has become a growing issue, with estimates indicating that 3.7 million Australian households struggled with food insecurity last year, largely due to the rising cost of living.
If found guilty, Coles and Woolworths could face significant fines, which may deter future deceptive practices. The ACCC is also seeking "community service orders," which could see the supermarkets fund registered charities to deliver meals to those in need. While the case plays out, consumer trust in these retailers continues to erode, and analysts predict that negative perceptions could drive shoppers to competitors like Aldi.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese weighed in on the issue, declaring that the actions of the supermarkets do not reflect "the Australian spirit" and insisting that "customers don’t deserve to be treated as fools by the supermarkets." As consumers await the outcome of the court case, the supermarket giants remain under intense scrutiny.