Love the SCHD ETF? CLM and CRF are better yielding alternatives

October 19, 2024 10:36 AM BST | By Invezz
 Love the SCHD ETF? CLM and CRF are better yielding alternatives
Image source: Invezz

The Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is one of Wall Street’s most popular dividend funds, thanks to its high dividend yield, payout growth, and strong performance since its inception.

SCHD is a popular dividend fund

This year alone, the fund has attracted over $4.7 billion in inflows, bringing its total assets to over $64 billion. 

SCHD has jumped by over 16% this year and is hovering near its all-time high, a notable thing since it does not have many popular technology names. Instead, it is made up of some traditional tech names that are less popular than the likes of NVIDIA, Microsoft, and Alphabet. 

Some of the top tech names in the fund are Texas Instrument and Insperity. Tech stocks account for just 8.79% of the fund. 

Still, the fund’s total return in the past five years has been 88%, making it one of the best-performing dividend players in the industry. Still, some investors question whether it is a real dividend fund since it yields just 3.39%. 

If you are concerned about its low yield, this article looks at two high-yielding funds that have a long track record of beating the SCHD ETF and even the popular Vanguard S&P 500 (VOO) and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).

Read more: Love the SCHD ETF? USA is a great 10% yielding alternative

Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund | CLM

First, we need to note that SCHD and CLM are different types of funds. SCHD is an ETF that invests in companies that track the Dow Jones US Dividend 100 Index. It has 103 companies, most of which are in the financials, healthcare, consumer staples, and industrials.

The CLM fund, however, is a closed-end fund that invests in 278 companies across multiple sectors. CEF and ETFs are different types of assets in that the former allows the use of leverage to maximize returns. Also, CEFs are more expensive than ETFs. In this case, the CLM fund has an expense ratio of 2.01%, while the SCHD charges 0.060%. 

The CLM is a classic dividend fund, thanks to its forward dividend yield of 16.1%. This means that a $10,000 investment will generate a gross return of $1,600. With the stock return included, the fund will have higher returns.

The CLM has invested in companies across most sectors in the US economy. Most of its investments are in the technology sector, and include names like Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Alphabet.

The other second biggest constituent are closed-end funds, which account for 15.6% of the fund. In this, the biggest constituent is the Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust. 

CLM has also invested in financials, healthcare, communication services, and consumer discretionary. 

At a quick glance, the fund has had a horrible return in the past five years as it has dropped by 27%, while the SCHD has risen by 58%. The same trend has happened this year as it has risen by 11.2%, while the SCHD has risen by 13.5%.

However, with dividends included, the CLM fund’s performance in the last five years was 84% compared to SCHD’s 88%.

CLM vs SCHD

Read more: SCHD: Blue chip SWAN ETF braces for 2 key crucial events

Cornerstone Total Return Fund | CRF

The Cornerstone Total Return Fund is another high-yielding closed-end fund that has done well over time. 

Established in 1973, the fund has had strong performance over time. At press time, the fund was trading at a 22.6% premium to its net asset value (NAV).

The biggest part of the fund is the technology sector, which accounts for 24.3% of its holdings. This includes companies like Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Alphabet, and Amazon. 

The other big constituent is closed-end funds like the Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund, and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund. 

By investing in the CRF fund, you also indirectly invest in many other companies. For example, the Gabelli Dividend & Income fund has invested in companies like American Express, Mastercard, JPMorgan, and Microsoft. This makes it a more diversified fund than the SCHD.

The CRF Fund has done better than the SCHD and the CLM over time. Its total return in the past five years stood at 97.84% compared to SCHD’s 88%. It has risen by over 36% this year compared to SCHD’s 16.6%.

SCHD vs CRF

The post Love the SCHD ETF? CLM and CRF are better yielding alternatives appeared first on Invezz


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Limited, Company No. 12643132 (“Kalkine Media, we or us”) and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. Kalkine Media is an appointed representative of Kalkine Limited, who is authorized and regulated by the FCA (FRN: 579414). The non-personalized advice given by Kalkine Media through its Content does not in any way endorse or recommend individuals, investment products or services suitable for your personal financial situation. You should discuss your portfolios and the risk tolerance level appropriate for your personal financial situation, with a qualified financial planner and/or adviser. No liability is accepted by Kalkine Media or Kalkine Limited and/or any of its employees/officers, for any investment loss, or any other loss or detriment experienced by you for any investment decision, whether consequent to, or in any way related to this Content, the provision of which is a regulated activity. Kalkine Media does not intend to exclude any liability which is not permitted to be excluded under applicable law or regulation. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable. However, on the date of publication of any such Content, none of the employees and/or associates of Kalkine Media hold positions in any of the stocks covered by Kalkine Media through its Content. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content. Some of the images/music/video that may be used in the Content are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music or video used in the Content unless stated otherwise. The images/music/video that may be used in the Content are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated or was found to be necessary.
This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next