AUS
NZ
UK
CA
USA
FRA
GER
ESP
ITA
NLD
PRT
SWE
GRC
IND
POL
BRA
ZAF
RUS
CHN
UAE
Hightlights:
- Helios Underwriting posts higher profits: Operating profit rose to £6.5m, driven by stronger investment income.
- Gross written premiums up: Premiums increased 45% year-on-year, supported by a 62% rise in syndicate capacity.
- Shares slip despite positive outlook: Helios’ stock dipped 3% in morning trading, contrasting with strong financial performance.
Helios Underwriting (LSE:HUW) reported a modest increase in operating profits for the first half of the year, despite a slight decline in its core underwriting results. The specialist Lloyd’s of London investment group highlighted that operating profit rose to £6.5m from £6.0m previously, as a notable rise in investment income helped offset weaker underwriting performance.
The underwriting result came in at £10.9m, down from £11.7m in the same period last year. However, investment income from syndicates showed a robust surge to £5.8m, up from £3.2m, underpinning the overall increase in profits. Helios attributed the strong performance to favorable conditions in the Lloyd’s market, which continues to see improved underwriting discipline, sustainable price increases, and strong growth.
Gross written premiums surged by 45% year-on-year to £230m, reflecting a 62% jump in retained Lloyd’s syndicate capacity participation to £397m. Michael Wade, Executive Chair of Helios, described the market conditions as "exceptionally good," citing increased underwriting rigor and a positive pricing environment as key drivers of the firm’s performance.
Wade emphasized that the company's diversified Lloyd’s syndicate portfolio strategy positions Helios well to continue capitalizing on the healthy conditions in the market. "Our financial performance so far this year reflects the strength of our proposition as well as the overall health of the Lloyd's market," Wade said in the trading update.
Despite the upbeat financials and positive outlook, Helios’ shares slipped nearly 3% by mid-morning in London, amid broader market volatility. Analysts noted that the market reaction might be influenced by profit-taking or external factors, rather than any specific concerns about the company’s underlying business.
