AUS
NZ
UK
CA
USA
FRA
GER
ESP
ITA
NLD
PRT
SWE
GRC
IND
POL
BRA
ZAF
RUS
CHN
UAE
Highlights:
- Rep. Al Green denies the existence of "Operation Chokepoint 2.0," a rumored program to debank crypto firms.
- Regulators issued warnings about working with crypto, not an official debanking order.
- Coinbase’s legal officer accuses regulators of misleading the public and pursuing “regulation through exhaustion.”
The ongoing debate over the regulatory approach to the cryptocurrency industry took center stage during a recent hearing held by the House Financial Services Committee’s Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. During the hearing, Democratic Rep. Al Green firmly rejected the claims surrounding a government program dubbed "Operation Chokepoint 2.0," which claimed that the Biden administration had orchestrated a scheme to debank crypto companies in the U.S.
Rep. Al Green’s Testimony: Debunking the Alleged Program
Rep. Green emphatically dismissed the allegations that a government-led effort existed to suppress the crypto industry by targeting its access to banking services. The congressman contended that there was no secretive or coordinated debanking effort under the Biden administration. Instead, he clarified that financial regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), merely issued advisory warnings to financial institutions about handling crypto firms. According to Green, these warnings were not orders to sever banking relationships with the crypto industry.
Shayna Olesiuk's Testimony on Regulatory Responsibilities
Supporting Rep. Green’s stance, Shayna Olesiuk, Director of Banking Policy at Better Markets, a Wall Street watchdog group, submitted written testimony to the committee. Olesiuk emphasized the challenges the cryptocurrency market introduces to the banking system and reaffirmed the regulatory responsibility to safeguard the interests of everyday Americans.
Coinbase's Legal Officer Challenges Regulatory Approach
During the same hearing, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, raised concerns about the way regulators had handled their communication regarding the crypto industry. Grewal accused regulators of engaging in "regulation through exhaustion," a strategy where regulatory pressure leads to difficult conditions for companies to operate, eventually forcing them to comply or exit the market. Grewal pointed to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Coinbase against the FDIC, which revealed that the regulator had sent letters to multiple banks in 2022, urging them to "pause all crypto asset-related activity."
Despite public statements from government officials indicating that cryptocurrency firms should have the same banking access as other industries, Grewal argued that regulators had simultaneously pressured financial institutions to distance themselves from the crypto sector. This dichotomy, he argued, created a misleading narrative for the public and left companies in the sector vulnerable to growing regulatory uncertainty.
Regulatory Clarity and Crypto’s Future
The discussion at the hearing underscores the complexities surrounding cryptocurrency regulation in the United States. As the industry continues to grow, the need for clear, consistent regulatory frameworks has become more urgent. The testimony provided by Rep. Green, Olesiuk, and Grewal highlights the divergent views on the role of government in overseeing crypto firms and ensuring the safety of financial markets. The regulatory landscape for cryptocurrency remains in flux, with ongoing debates about the balance between fostering innovation and protecting consumers.
