A high-stakes showdown emerges between the world’s richest man and Asia’s wealthiest

October 15, 2024 07:45 AM EDT | By Invezz
 A high-stakes showdown emerges between the world’s richest man and Asia’s wealthiest
Image source: Invezz

India’s satellite broadband sector is becoming a battleground for two of the world’s most influential businessmen—Tesla and Starlink chief Elon Musk and Reliance chairman Mukesh Ambani.

The controversy centers on how India should allocate its satellite broadband spectrum. Musk’s Starlink prefers administrative allocation, while Ambani’s Reliance is pushing for an auction-based approach.

This conflict has placed the regulatory framework of India’s telecom sector under the spotlight, with potential implications for both domestic and international players.

India’s spectrum allocation: auction or administrative route?

At the heart of the dispute is the method of spectrum allocation.

Musk advocates for administrative allotment, which aligns with a global trend of treating satellite spectrum as a shared natural resource.

According to Musk, this approach would allow various companies to operate fairly in India’s rapidly growing satellite broadband market.

On the other hand, Ambani’s Reliance is pushing for a more competitive auction-based process.

Reliance believes that auctioning the spectrum would create a level playing field, especially since foreign players like Starlink could potentially offer both voice and data services, competing with traditional telecom operators.

On Sunday, Reuters reported that Reliance contends India’s telecom regulator- Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has wrongly determined that home satellite broadband spectrum should be allocated rather than auctioned, without obtaining input from the industry, and is calling for the consultation process to restart.

While TRAI is currently conducting a public consultation, Reliance, in a private letter dated October 10, requested that the process be restarted, arguing that the regulator had “pre-emptively interpreted” that allocation, rather than auction, is the preferred approach.

“TRAI seems to have concluded, without any basis, that spectrum assignment should be administrative,” Reliance’s senior regulatory affairs official Kapoor Singh Guliani wrote in the letter to India’s telecoms minister, Jyotiraditya Scindia, as reported by Reuters.

Ambani’s Reliance Jio, the largest telecom player in India with 480 million users, views the auction as crucial to safeguarding local businesses and ensuring fair competition.

Musk reacts to Reliance’s lobbying

Musk’s comments on the issue have been sharp. Responding to the report about Ambani’s lobbying, Musk stated on X (formerly Twitter) that India moving towards auctioning satellite broadband spectrum would be “unprecedented.”

He referenced the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), which regulates satellite spectrum globally, and emphasized that spectrum should be allocated “rationally, efficiently, and economically.”

Musk’s argument is that auctioning satellite spectrum contradicts international practices and could hinder innovation in the satellite broadband space.

His position has sparked significant debate in India, especially as Starlink eyes its entry into the Indian market.

The regulatory debate and economic stakes

How spectrum for satellite services in India will be given out has been a contentious issue since last year.

The current dispute is over interpretation of Indian law that some in the industry say paved the way for the allocation of spectrum last year as Musk wanted.

TRAI has in its consultation paper indicated Indian laws mandate allocation of spectrum for such services without conducting any studies, Reliance added in its letter, which is not public.

Reliance previously told Reuters it is “imperative” upon the Indian regulator to consult on the methodology of spectrum assignment.

With India’s satellite services market projected to grow at a rate of 36% per year and reach $1.9 billion by 2030, the stakes are high for both Starlink and Reliance.

The outcome of this regulatory debate could set the stage for future competition in India’s satellite broadband sector, with global players like Amazon’s Project Kuiper also watching closely.

This clash between Musk and Ambani is not just a regulatory dispute but a high-profile battle that could shape the future of India’s satellite broadband landscape.

The post A high-stakes showdown emerges between the world's richest man and Asia's wealthiest appeared first on Invezz


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations, and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Incorporated (“Kalkine Media, we or us”), Business Number: 720744275BC0001 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The advice given by Kalkine Media through its Content is general information only and it does not take into account the user’s personal investment objectives, financial situation and specific needs. Users should make their own enquiries about any investment and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media is not registered as an investment adviser in Canada under either the provincial or territorial Securities Acts. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, however, on the date of publication of any such Content, none of the employees and/or associates of Kalkine Media hold positions in any of the stocks covered by Kalkine Media through its Content. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content. Some of the images/music that may be used in the Content are copyrighted to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used in the Content unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used in the Content are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated or was found to be necessary.
This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.

Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.