Comparison Survey: Federal Agricultural Mortgage (NYSE:AGM) vs. Fannie Mae (OTC:FNMA)

2 min read | February 18, 2025 10:13 PM PST | By Team Kalkine Media

Comparison Survey: Federal Agricultural Mortgage (NYSE:AGM) vs. Fannie Mae (OTC:FNMA) — Image source: Shutterstock

A Comparative Analysis of Two Industry Giants

Federal Agricultural Mortgage (NYSE:AGM) and Fannie Mae (OTC:FNMA) play crucial roles in financial services, yet they cater to different market segments. Federal Agricultural Mortgage specializes in the agricultural loan market, offering financial services that include purchasing, servicing, and guaranteeing payments for agricultural-related credit. Established in 1987, the company plays a vital role in supporting rural infrastructure and agribusiness financing.

In contrast, Fannie Mae (OTC:FNMA), founded in 1938, is a cornerstone of the U.S. housing finance system. It focuses on mortgage-backed securities (MBS), enhancing liquidity in the housing market through partnerships with lenders, banks, and other financial institutions. Its operations span single-family and multifamily mortgage financing.

Profitability Performance

Examining financial strength, Federal Agricultural Mortgage boasts a net margin of 12.59%, coupled with an impressive return on equity (ROE) of 20.14%. Meanwhile, Fannie Mae records a net margin of 11.22% but struggles with a negative return on equity. These indicators highlight Federal Agricultural Mortgage’s stronger financial footing and operational efficiency.

Institutional Trust and Market Confidence

Investor confidence is another key differentiator. Approximately 68% of Federal Agricultural Mortgage's shares are held by institutional investors, reinforcing the company’s credibility in the financial community. Conversely, Fannie Mae lacks institutional backing, limiting its market trust and investor engagement.

Stock Volatility and Risk Assessment

Market fluctuations affect both entities, yet Federal Agricultural Mortgage demonstrates lower volatility. With a beta of 1.08, it maintains moderate market sensitivity, while Fannie Mae, with a higher beta of 1.98, exhibits significantly greater volatility. This suggests that Federal Agricultural Mortgage's stock movements are comparatively stable, reducing risk exposure.

Valuation Insights

Despite Fannie Mae’s larger revenue base, Federal Agricultural Mortgage presents a more appealing valuation, particularly in terms of price-to-earnings ratios. Analysts indicate a potential upside for Federal Agricultural Mortgage, emphasizing its attractive market position.

Both Federal Agricultural Mortgage (NYSE:AGM) and Fannie Mae (OTC:FNMA) occupy essential spaces in the financial sector, yet Federal Agricultural Mortgage stands out in several key areas. With stronger profitability, institutional backing, and a favorable valuation outlook, it demonstrates a solid competitive edge in this comparative assessment.

Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media LLC (Kalkine Media, we or us) and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The principal purpose of the Content is to educate and inform. The Content does not contain or imply any recommendation or opinion intended to influence your financial decisions and must not be relied upon by you as such. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, but is NOT a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell or hold the stocks of the company(s) or engage in any investment activity under discussion. Kalkine Media is neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice through this platform. Users should make their own enquiries about any investments and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used on this website are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures/music displayed/used on this website unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used on this website are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source (public domain/CC0 status) to where it was found and indicated it, as necessary.