Tesco and Sainsbury’s Criticised for Misleading Plastic Recycling Schemes

2 min read | October 01, 2024 07:46 AM EDT | By Team Kalkine Media

Google News:

Tesco and Sainsbury’s Criticised for Misleading Plastic Recycling Schemes — Image source: Shutterstock

Recent News

Brookfield Valuation Debate Intensifies After Major Capital Moves

Canadian National Railway Valuation Question Emerges After Strong Rall...

Pan American Silver Skarn Plan Brings Growth Story Back Ahead

Bank of Montreal Banking Strategy Faces New Digital Growth Moment

Make Kalkine Media
My Trusted Source

Highlights:

Tesco and Sainsbury’s were criticised for misleading customers about the fate of plastics collected through their in-store recycling schemes.

70% of soft plastics collected were found to be burned for energy, with some waste ending up overseas.

Waitrose announced a trial cork recycling scheme, marking the first such initiative by a major UK supermarket.

Tesco PLC (LSE:TSCO) and J Sainsbury PLC (LSE:SBRY) have come under scrutiny for misleading customers about their in-store plastic recycling schemes. A study conducted by Everyday Plastic and the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) found that the majority of soft plastics collected in supermarket recycling stations ended up being incinerated, rather than recycled as promised.

The investigation tracked 40 loads of soft plastic waste, such as single-use bags and films, using Apple tracking devices. The study revealed that 70% of the waste sent to known destinations was burned for energy rather than recycled, with some of the waste even ending up overseas. A small portion of the waste was repurposed into fuel pellets or downcycled into lower-value plastic products, but only one instance of recycling occurred within the UK. Collectively, the waste traveled over 25,000 kilometers.

Everyday Plastic’s research director, Alison Colclough, said that while the supermarkets' schemes were presented as a solution, they distracted from the larger issue of excessive plastic packaging production. EIA ocean campaigner Lauren Weir added that the UK’s inability to effectively process its own waste should not place the burden on other countries.

Sainsbury’s responded by stating that damaged plastics may need to be converted into energy, but claimed that the “majority” of plastics in good condition are recycled. Tesco reiterated its commitment to reducing and recycling packaging where possible, including using waste for fuel when necessary.

The study, supported by legal analysis from ClientEarth, argued that the information provided by the supermarkets around these recycling schemes was "misleading." In a separate development, Waitrose announced a new initiative to trial cork recycling in its stores, marking a first for a major UK supermarket.

Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Incorporated (Kalkine Media), Business Number: 720744275BC0001 and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. The advice given by Kalkine Media through its Content is general information only and it does not take into account the user’s personal investment objectives, financial situation and specific needs. Users should make their own enquiries about any investment and Kalkine Media strongly suggests the users to seek advice from a financial adviser, stockbroker or other professional (including taxation and legal advice), as necessary. Kalkine Media is not registered as an investment adviser in Canada under either the provincial or territorial Securities Acts. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable, however, on the date of publication of any such Content, none of the employees and/or associates of Kalkine Media hold positions in any of the stocks covered by Kalkine Media through its Content. Kalkine Media hereby disclaims any and all the liabilities to any user for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising from any use of the Content on this website, which is provided without warranties. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music that may be used in the Content are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music used in the Content unless stated otherwise. The images/music that may be used in the Content are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated or was found to be necessary.