Why has FAA ordered inspection of Boeing 777 with Pratt & Whitney engines 

4 min read | February 24, 2021 09:18 AM GMT | By Team Kalkine Media

Source: Shutterstock

Summary

  • Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has ordered inspection of all Boeing 777 planes.
  • All Boeing 777 planes powered by Pratt & Whitney engines to be inspected.
  • Order comes days after a United 777 flight in Denver faced engine failure.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has called for a detailed inspection of all Boeing Co (LON: BOE) 777s that are powered by Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines before they can fly again.  The order comes days after a United flight in Denver faced an engine failure right after takeoff. The PW4000 engines are used on less than 10 per cent of Boeing’s global fleet. 

The FAA has ordered operators to do a thermal acoustic image inspection of the titanium blades placed in front of the engine. A thermal inspection lets inspectors notice cracks that maybe present inside the titanium blades that are otherwise not visible.  

Also read: Boeing to pay $2.5 Billion to Settle Charges in 737 MAX Crash probe 

The FAA said that the frequency of the blade inspections is not being increased yet, but it would be reviewing the results gradually and it might then come up with a directive on a new inspection interval. The order said that the FAA would revise its directive after getting the initial results and other data it receives from the investigation. 

Following the incident, several Boeing 777s worldwide have either been temporarily grounded, withdrawn from service, or banned. Like South Korea’s transport ministry has ordered that all airlines need to inspect the blades every 1,000 cycle. One cycle represents the time taken for one takeoff and landing. 

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which is investigating the Denver mishap, said that metal fatigue led to the crack in a fan blade in the engine. One blade snapped and it dislocated another blade and damaged parts of the engine. A neighbourhood was pelted with debris but there were no casualties on the ground and the plane managed to land safely. 

Also read: The Very First Boeing 737 Max Commercial Flight Takes Off In Nearly Two Years! 

Robert Sumwalt, chairman of NTSB, had said on Monday that preliminary investigations had found that the broken blade fractured the blade next to it, which resulted in the engine breakage. He also said that the first broken blade was flown to PW headquarters in a private jet for investigation. He said that the NTSB is trying to get hold of the problem so that such mishaps can be avoided in future. 

Also read: A new Boeing crash. What’s ailing the Indonesian aviation industry? 

The FAA order comes after repeated engine failures of similar nature. In 2018, in a United 777 flight with the same P&W engine faced a fan blade failure. In another incident in December 2020, a Japan Airlines 777 saw a fan blade breakage. 

In a statement, P&W said that to conduct the inspection, the fan blades would have to be taken to the company’s FAA-certified repair station to look into the problem. The company also said that it was coordinating with Boeing, regulators, and airline operators for the required inspection.  

Boeing, on its part, said that it would work together with its customers to adhere to the FAA guidelines. The United Airlines said that it would go through the process required to make sure that all the 52 of its aircraft impacted by the directive meet the necessary safety standards.  


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Limited, Company No. 12643132 (Kalkine Media, we or us) and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. Kalkine Media is an appointed representative of Kalkine Limited, who is authorized and regulated by the FCA (FRN: 579414). The non-personalised advice given by Kalkine Media through its Content does not in any way endorse or recommend individuals, investment products or services suitable for your personal financial situation. You should discuss your portfolios and the risk tolerance level appropriate for your personal financial situation, with a qualified financial planner and/or adviser. No liability is accepted by Kalkine Media or Kalkine Limited and/or any of its employees/officers, for any investment loss, or any other loss or detriment experienced by you for any investment decision, whether consequent to, or in any way related to this Content, the provision of which is a regulated activity. Kalkine Media does not intend to exclude any liability which is not permitted to be excluded under applicable law or regulation. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable. However, on the date of publication of any such Content, none of the employees and/or associates of Kalkine Media hold positions in any of the stocks covered by Kalkine Media through its Content. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music/video that may be used in the Content are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music or video used in the Content unless stated otherwise. The images/music/video that may be used in the Content are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated or was found to be necessary.


Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next