The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has initiated legal action against Coles Group Limited (ASX:COL) and Woolworths Group Limited (ASX:WOW), alleging that the two largest supermarket chains misled customers regarding price discounts on various popular products.
According to the ACCC, both companies engaged in deceptive marketing practices through long-standing promotional campaigns, including Woolworths' "Prices Dropped" and Coles' "Down Down" promotions. These campaigns have been presented to consumers as signifying sustained reductions in regular prices for supermarket items. However, the ACCC alleges that the advertised promotional prices were often equal to or higher than the previous regular prices for many of the affected products.
ACCC chairwoman Gina Cass-Gottlieb stated, “Following many years of marketing campaigns by Woolworths and Coles, Australian consumers have come to understand that the ‘Prices Dropped’ and ‘Down Down’ promotions relate to a sustained reduction in the regular prices of supermarket products. However, in the case of these products, we allege the new ‘Prices Dropped’ and ‘Down Down’ promotional prices were actually higher than, or the same as, the previous regular price.”
The lawsuit claims that Woolworths (ASX:WOW) misled consumers on 266 products over 20 months, while Coles (ASX:COL) engaged in deceptive conduct regarding 245 products over a 15-month period. The ACCC is seeking declarations, penalties, costs, and other remedial orders from the court. Additionally, the regulator is pursuing community service orders that would require both companies to fund a registered charity for meal delivery to Australians in need, beyond their existing charitable initiatives.
Among the affected products are well-known brands such as Arnott’s Tim Tam biscuits, Danone yoghurt, Palmolive shampoo, and Coca-Cola soft drinks. The ACCC's legal action highlights the importance of transparent pricing practices, particularly in the competitive supermarket sector where consumers rely on advertised discounts for purchasing decisions.
This case is expected to attract significant attention as it unfolds, given the high-profile nature of the companies involved and the scale of the alleged misleading conduct. Both Woolworths (ASX:WOW) and Coles (ASX:COL) maintain a substantial presence in the Australian retail market, and any negative findings could have broader implications for their reputations and operations.
In the wider context of consumer protection, this lawsuit serves as a critical reminder of the role regulatory bodies like the ACCC play in ensuring businesses adhere to fair trading practices. The outcome of this case may establish a precedent for how promotional campaigns are conducted and advertised in the future, not only for supermarket giants but also for the broader retail industry in Australia.