Communications Alliance Urges Changes to Scam Prevention Framework

2 min read | October 08, 2024 06:10 AM BST | By Team Kalkine Media

Highlights

  • Telcos face regulatory risks under the proposed Scam Prevention Framework.
  • The Communications Alliance seeks clearer protections for telecom companies.
  • Concerns raised about overlapping enforcement from multiple agencies.

The Communications Alliance has raised concerns about the Albanese Government's proposed Scam Prevention Framework (SPF), warning that telecommunications companies could be exposed to legal risks under multiple regulatory codes. The peak industry body is calling for urgent changes to the framework to avoid what it describes as "quadruple jeopardy" for telcos.

According to Communications Alliance chief executive Luke Coleman, the current draft of the SPF could subject telecommunications companies to enforcement actions from multiple regulatory bodies, including the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC), the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), and potential legal challenges through the courts. Coleman emphasized that telcos complying with the industry code should be shielded from these overlapping liabilities.

The submission from the Communications Alliance also highlights the complexity of determining which telecommunications carrier is responsible for a scam-related incident. This could expose telcos to multiple penalties for the same issue, despite their longstanding efforts to combat scams.

The Alliance is advocating for a more streamlined regulatory approach, stressing the need for a single regulator with clear jurisdiction to prevent conflicting oversight responsibilities. While supporting the overall aim of expanding scam prevention across sectors, the group warns that the current framework could lead to unnecessary regulatory burdens.

In contrast, other voices, such as AFCA chief executive David Locke, are urging large banks and telcos to take immediate action to combat scams, regardless of regulatory requirements. The framework, as it stands, could impose fines of up to A$50 million on companies that fail to prevent scams.

FinTech Australia, another key stakeholder, has suggested batch reporting of scam data rather than real-time reporting to ease the compliance burden on companies.

The Communications Alliance is pushing for amendments to ensure that telecommunications companies are not exposed to multiple legal actions, while also supporting a more efficient regulatory structure to tackle scam-related issues.


Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Limited, Company No. 12643132 (Kalkine Media, we or us) and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. Kalkine Media is an appointed representative of Kalkine Limited, who is authorized and regulated by the FCA (FRN: 579414). The non-personalised advice given by Kalkine Media through its Content does not in any way endorse or recommend individuals, investment products or services suitable for your personal financial situation. You should discuss your portfolios and the risk tolerance level appropriate for your personal financial situation, with a qualified financial planner and/or adviser. No liability is accepted by Kalkine Media or Kalkine Limited and/or any of its employees/officers, for any investment loss, or any other loss or detriment experienced by you for any investment decision, whether consequent to, or in any way related to this Content, the provision of which is a regulated activity. Kalkine Media does not intend to exclude any liability which is not permitted to be excluded under applicable law or regulation. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable. However, on the date of publication of any such Content, none of the employees and/or associates of Kalkine Media hold positions in any of the stocks covered by Kalkine Media through its Content. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media. Some of the images/music/video that may be used in the Content are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music or video used in the Content unless stated otherwise. The images/music/video that may be used in the Content are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated or was found to be necessary.


Sponsored Articles


Investing Ideas

Previous Next