Apple Loses Bid to Dismiss Justice Department Antitrust Suit

July 01, 2025 12:53 AM IST | By EODHD
 Apple Loses Bid to Dismiss Justice Department Antitrust Suit
Image source: Kalkine Media
(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. lost its bid to throw out an antitrust case brought by the US Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general on Monday, a victory for the aggressive posture taken during the Biden administration and carried on by enforcers under President Donald Trump. Most Read from Bloomberg Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center The lawsuit is an existential threat to Apple and could upend its highly lucrative mobile hardware business. The iPhone maker is accused of violating antitrust laws by blocking rivals from accessing hardware and software features on its popular devices. The government claims Apple has used its power over app distribution and the iPhone’s features to thwart innovations that would have made it easier for consumers to switch phones. ‘Monopoly Power’ In this early stage of the case, “allegations of this nature, which indicate that Apple acts in a manner to protect its monopoly power in the smartphone and performance smartphone market, are sufficient,” US District Judge Julien Xavier Neals in New Jersey wrote in a 33-page ruling. Neals also said the allegations about Apple’s intent to monopolize the smartphone market are strong enough to continue. The “complaint includes numerous statements allegedly made by Apple executives regarding the barriers set in place to maintain its monopoly.” DOJ representatives declined to comment. Apple didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. The ruling tees up years of litigation. Neals has not yet set a trial date, but antitrust cases can take years to resolve, including appeals. The DOJ sued Alphabet Inc.’s Google over its search business in October 2020, with a judge ruling four years later the company violated the law. Apple could still seek to settle the case — filed in March 2024 — with the Trump administration, though the Justice Department’s new antitrust head, Gail Slater, said at her confirmation hearing that she plans to largely continue the strict enforcement of her predecessors. In addition to the Google search suit, the US has targeted Google’s advertising technology business as well as Visa Inc., Live Nation Inc. and Thoma Bravo-backed real estate software company RealPage Inc. Apple’s Argument In a November hearing, lawyers for Apple urged Neals to toss the case because it failed to state how the iPhone maker’s alleged monopoly has harmed any consumers or developers. Story Continues Apple’s lawyers also argued that Apple has a legal right to choose with whom it does business and it has no duty to boost the fortunes of its competitors. Apple has refused to support cross-platform messaging apps, limited third-party digital wallets and non-Apple smartwatches, and blocked mobile cloud streaming services, according to the lawsuit. The judge said those claims can proceed. “To the extent Apple argues it can limit access to its ‘own proprietary technology available to third parties,’ the court finds this contention is a factual dispute that must be resolved through discovery,” Neals wrote, alluding to pretrial information exchanges. The DOJ says the case is not about Apple refusing to do business with rivals. Rather, it accuses Apple of using its dominant position in the smartphone market to block competitors, a lawyer for the DOJ said at the hearing. The Justice Department and the states argue that Apple’s conduct was a deliberate attempt to box out rivals and build an illegal “moat” around the iPhone. The case is USA v. Apple Inc., 24-cv-04055, US District Court, District of New Jersey. (Updates with excerpts from ruling starting in third paragraph.) Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek America’s Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap’s Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. View Comments

Disclaimer

The content, including but not limited to any articles, news, quotes, information, data, text, reports, ratings, opinions, images, photos, graphics, graphs, charts, animations and video (Content) is a service of Kalkine Media Limited, Company No. 12643132 (“Kalkine Media, we or us”) and is available for personal and non-commercial use only. Kalkine Media is an appointed representative of Kalkine Limited, who is authorized and regulated by the FCA (FRN: 579414). The non-personalized advice given by Kalkine Media through its Content does not in any way endorse or recommend individuals, investment products or services suitable for your personal financial situation. You should discuss your portfolios and the risk tolerance level appropriate for your personal financial situation, with a qualified financial planner and/or adviser. No liability is accepted by Kalkine Media or Kalkine Limited and/or any of its employees/officers, for any investment loss, or any other loss or detriment experienced by you for any investment decision, whether consequent to, or in any way related to this Content, the provision of which is a regulated activity. Kalkine Media does not intend to exclude any liability which is not permitted to be excluded under applicable law or regulation. Some of the Content on this website may be sponsored/non-sponsored, as applicable. However, on the date of publication of any such Content, none of the employees and/or associates of Kalkine Media hold positions in any of the stocks covered by Kalkine Media through its Content. The views expressed in the Content by the guests, if any, are their own and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Kalkine Media.
The content published on Kalkine Media also includes feeds sourced from third-party providers. Kalkine does not assert any ownership rights over the content provided by these third-party sources. The inclusion of such feeds on the Website is for informational purposes only. Kalkine does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content obtained from third-party feeds. Furthermore, Kalkine Media shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content obtained from third-party feeds, nor for any damages or losses arising from the use of such content. Some of the images/music/video that may be used in the Content are copyright to their respective owner(s). Kalkine Media does not claim ownership of any of the pictures displayed/music or video used in the Content unless stated otherwise. The images/music/video that may be used in the Content are taken from various sources on the internet, including paid subscriptions or are believed to be in public domain. We have used reasonable efforts to accredit the source wherever it was indicated or was found to be necessary.
This disclaimer is subject to change without notice. Users are advised to review this disclaimer periodically for any updates or modifications.

Sponsored Articles


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.