AUS
NZ
UK
CA
USA
FRA
GER
ESP
ITA
NLD
PRT
SWE
GRC
IND
POL
BRA
ZAF
RUS
CHN
UAE
The British government has decided not to defend against legal challenges concerning the development of the Rosebank and Jackdaw North Sea oil fields. These challenges, brought forward by Greenpeace and Uplift, focus on the environmental and climate impacts associated with the proposed developments at these sites, located west of Shetland and east of Aberdeen, respectively.
On Thursday, government officials confirmed that they would no longer contest the legal claims related to the licenses granted for these oil fields under the previous administration. Despite this decision, the licenses for Rosebank and Jackdaw remain valid, which means that the energy companies involved, Equinor and Shell PLC (LSE:SHEL), are still subject to the claims made by Greenpeace and Uplift.
Greenpeace UK’s climate campaign head, Mel Evans, criticized the decision, arguing that the permits for these oil fields should not have been issued without a thorough assessment of their climate impact. Evans stated, “These permits should never have been granted without being properly assessed for their impact on the climate. The two new fields combined would generate a vast amount of emissions while doing nothing to lower energy bills. The only real winners from giving them the green light would be multi-billion-pound oil giants.”
This development follows a Supreme Court ruling in June, which emphasized the necessity of evaluating emissions when planning new fossil fuel projects. The Rosebank field, in particular, has been noted as the last major untapped oil field remaining in the UK.
The legal challenges against these projects underscore growing concerns about the environmental consequences of continued fossil fuel exploration and extraction. By opting not to defend the challenges, the government has effectively allowed the environmental groups' claims to proceed, potentially influencing future decisions and policies related to fossil fuel developments.
The outcome of these legal proceedings could have significant implications for the future of fossil fuel projects in the UK, particularly in light of recent judicial rulings that stress the importance of environmental considerations in energy planning and policy.