It is an options trading strategy used by derivatives traders. The strategy aims to offset volatility infused downside risks. The traders using this strategy place a limit on probable maximum loss and maximum possible gains. It is done by purchasing a cap and floor price for the derivative instrument. The zero-cost collar strategy is generally used in bearish markets by removing ‘out of money options from the portfolio. Hence, it is also referred to as a costless collar strategy sometimes.
Investors use the zero-cost collar or costless collar strategy to place a limit maximum probable loss. However, it also caps the maximum potential gain they can make.
It is a protective derivative tactic often implemented when a long position in security experiences significant gains.
Once such gains are achieved, and the market turns bearish, investors to protect their earnings, buy a protective put option (right not obligation to sell underlying) and sell an equally covered call (right not obligation to buy underlying) option.
Usually, the investor buys an out of money put option and at the same time sells or writes, and out of money call option. Both of these derivatives contain the same expiration date.
The maximum profit using this strategy is thus the difference between the options strike price and the purchase price of the underlying security.
Often options investors and traders use this strategy when the underlying security price is greater than the strike price call option sold.
Therefore, the investor’s maximum loss is the purchase price of underlying stock minus strike price put option purchased. Also, the maximum possible gain is the difference in underlying security price, which is lesser than the strike price of the purchased call option.
The costless collar strategy attracts market players looking to zero down costs of execution. However, it may not always zero down the entire costs as premiums of the call option and put option may not always match.
Derivative traders still use the strategy and enter a trade with either a net credit or debit caused by premiums. In a net debit trade, he/she would sell the call option out-of-money, and loss would be more than the bought put options’ strike and underlying price difference. Alternatively, in a net credit trade, he/she would purchase a put option that is more ‘out-of-money than the call option sold.
Source: © Akridiy | Megapixl.com
Let us consider; an investor Mr Bigbill owns 100 shares of Aplle Inc. He has bought them for US$90. At present, due to a macro-economic policy affecting technology companies, Apple Inc. securities start trading lower, at US$85. Now, to protect against further downside risk, Mr Bighill will set up a zero-cost collar. He will purchase a put option at an US$83 strike price on Apple Inc. shares and sell a call option on the same with a US$92 strike price.
Now let’s say at that time, the call options got sold at a premium price of US$2 per share and put options got purchased at a premium price of US$2 per share. So it means that the investor struck trade at zero costs or was a costless trade for Mr Bigbill.
Now, if the security expires for US$92 or more, then Mr Bigbill will achieve a maximum profit of US$200. It is because his 100 underlying shares will gain US$2 (i.e. US$92 – US$90).
On the other hand, if shares expire for US$83 or slightly lower, then Mr Bigbill will experience a maximum loss of US$700. It is just 100 underlying securities of Apple Inc. multiplied by US$7 (i.e. US$90 –US$83).
Therefore, using the costless collar, Mr Bigbill will experience taking a protective position at zero costs. It will also protect Mr Bigbill from any further downside risks.
Zero collar cost is just one options trading strategy, a few other similar strategies to a costless collar that help limit risks even though limiting profit potential are-.
Source: © Adiruch | Megapixl.com
The benefits of using a costless collar or a zero-cost collar strategy are –
On the flip side, the major pullbacks of zero cost collar are-